You were asked to step outside the only protection you had
Mars market mirrors
marshjhtog245vzjzcicnmv2ci6yljibvdm4pngq5kmkfvcutppboxad.onion
marsiujka6lrsaqpnxiwvknthhzsrlmq77mnl2fi62guc4lwxif65syd.onion
marsmtbwtxkohhpu34m4jkwcntian7n257wsex5tbkmsjdjrsz6me3yd.onion
Printed as supplied, in no order. Nothing here is watched or timed, so an address that opens is not proof of anything. More about the set
The request is always reasonable sounding. A discount. A faster dispatch. A problem with the escrow system on their end. An account issue that will be sorted next week.
What is being requested is that you move the money out of the one arrangement that gives you any recourse, into one that gives you none.
- Responsible
- The vendor. Asking is the act, and it is a rule breach on essentially every market that has such a rule.
- Usually blamed on
- The market afterwards, for not protecting a transaction that was deliberately taken outside their protection.
- What follows
- It is the clearest single signal available in this whole subject. It ends the question of whether to trade with that vendor.
What escrow actually does
It holds the payment until a condition is met, and it gives a third party the power to decide where the money goes if the two sides disagree. That third party has its own interests and is far from perfect. It is still the only thing standing between a buyer and a stranger.
Outside it there is no process at all. There is no arbitration, no record the market will consider, and no lever of any kind. A direct payment to a stranger is a gift with a strong expectation attached.
The reasons offered, and what they mean
| What is said | What it actually is |
|---|---|
| A discount for paying direct | The discount is the price of your protection, and it is being priced very low |
| Escrow is broken for me right now | If true, the correct response is to wait rather than to proceed |
| My account is having a problem | An account with a problem is a reason to stop, not a reason to route around it |
| We have dealt before, it is fine | History with a profile is history with an account, and accounts change hands |
| Faster dispatch if we skip it | Speed being traded for recourse is the trade that is being proposed |
Why the market gets blamed later
Because when it goes wrong the buyer goes to the market, and the market says there is nothing they can do. That feels like abandonment. It is not. The transaction was deliberately placed outside the system that could have acted, and the market is being asked to rule on something it has no record of and no authority over.
It is worth being blunt. This is the case on the whole site where the outcome is most predictable in advance and least recoverable afterwards.
What follows from getting it right
The request is a complete answer by itself. You do not need to work out whether the vendor is honest, because an honest vendor with a real problem still would not ask you to carry the whole risk of it. Report it if the market has a way to report it, and move on.
One caution worth stating plainly. Somebody impersonating a vendor you already trust will make exactly this request, and it will arrive in a channel that is not the market messaging. Any request to move a payment that arrives outside the market should be treated as hostile until proven otherwise, and proving otherwise needs a key.
The version that catches careful people
Almost nobody falls for this on a first order. It works on the fifth, with a vendor who has been reliable, over something small, when the request seems like a favour between people who know each other.
That framing is the mechanism. The protection was never about whether the vendor was decent. It was about what happens if this particular transaction goes wrong, which is a question about the future rather than about the person. A good record predicts a good outcome most of the time and predicts nothing at all about the case where it does not.
So the rule has to be flat and unconditional, because a rule with exceptions in it will be applied by the version of you that already wants to make an exception.